The League of Extraordinary Gentlewomen Tuesday, Feb 23 2010 

Miss Murray – A Gentlewoman

There are some similarities, in fact, between Alan Moore’s graphic novel, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, and Stephen Norrington’s adaptation, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Many passionate fans of the comic book would argue that they are two very different works, but the idea is essentially the same. Alan Moore assembled a world where all of Britain’s greatest literary heroes are united. The movie plays more on the epic material rather than on the plot. The first difference can be seen as Wilhelmina Murray’s role as the leader or chief figure. Her part as a strong woman in a colonizing world is viewed grimly by people, making her different, out of the ordinary, extraordinary. She has yet to have shown any powers or skills similar to her compatriots, but she has talents. She is able to control the gravest of beasts (such as her ability to subdue Mr. Edward Hyde). This strength in a women in this society of controlled and “proper” ladies (as strangely portrayed in Miss Rosa Coote’s Correctional Academy for Wayward Gentlewomen) is unconditional, making her the monster to the extent of her being different (not that she has claws or anything). This development in Mina Murray is plainly seen in the graphic novel, but the movie fails to include any such story in her character. She is not even the leader in the story (incredible, right?). Still, the movie adaptation of the comic is quite a thrill ride and worth the my time.

In addition (as an aside), Alan Moore focuses deeply within British literature and bases every character from a pre-existing novel (a British one). His use of Professor Moriarty, Sherlock Holmes’s nemesis, is an unexpected one. I, in fact had trouble accepting him as a villain, since the story of Sherlock Holmes, though science-fiction, seems possible in real life, while the league of extraordinary gentlemen is rather far-fetched.

“Disgrace”: At First Glance Wednesday, Feb 3 2010 

Disgrace—the loss of respect, honor, or esteem; ignominy; shame*—is also a matter of perspectives. In J.M. Coetzee’s novel, Disgrace, disgrace play a key role and is in fact the key theme. Having read far into the first half of the book, the plot has already expanded far beyond imagining, but let me start from the beginning:

The first sentence is promising, having solved the problem of sex rather well. The problem of sex, a problem or more of an issue and state of mind? Can people classify sex as a problem? David Lurie, this novel’s protagonist, could not think of sex as a problem, but more as a pleasure (a private pleasure). The question of privacy is then put at risk, since Professor Lurie is thought of having sexually harassed one of his students. This student, Melanie, was used as a tool to fill a void, a way of filling a hole in Lurie’s heart. At the age of 52, David should in fact retire from his wild and vile ways (or so thinks society). He of course thinks not. Now, back to privacy. After Lurie was fired from Cape Technical University, he rejoins his daughter, Lucy, in South Africa on her farm. (SPOILER ALERT!) There, his daughter was raped, but she does not wish to tell the police of this assault.

“The reason is that, as far as I am concerned, what happened to me is a purely provate matter. In another time, in another place it might be held to be a public matter. But in this place, at this time, it is not. It is my business, mine alone.” (112)

Why? Why would she not inform some official about a rape? Can someone really this stubborn; is it really so private? Realistically, a victim cannot be looked down upon; it was out of her control. Being an object in a rape is nothing uncommon, but to hold it against herself is. Could it just be the shock? We shall see later on as I continue my discussion on privacy in J.M. Coetzee’s Disgrace.
*Dictionary.com definition

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.